Sentence examples for recognised differences from inspiring English sources

The sensor recognised differences in crop canopy so could adapt the application to different citrus crop systems in commercial orchards.

Within positive full scan mass spectra, MetExtract recognised differences of ∆24.081 u (theoretical value) between the C and C peak pairs originating from an intact T2 backbone.

Whilst there are recognised differences in beliefs about medicines, the literature describing adherence levels is scarce amongst South Asian RA patients.

While differences between hotel-based sex workers, brothel-based sex workers and street-based sex workers have long been recognised, differences between individuals living in brothels have less often been focused upon.

However, a potential criticism of this study includes conflicting opinion on the value of extrapolating HRM systems from non-healthcare to healthcare organisations particularly where there are recognised differences in the nature of executive management, staff employment and representation, attitude to political changes and the role of profit making [ 42, 81].

It is consistent with the long recognised differences in pathogenicity and efficacy of anti-microbial drug treatments between MAP and M. tuberculosis infections in humans [63] the genetic basis for which is beginning to emerge [64].

In order to understand global health systems debates and the tensions between actors, it helps to recognise differences between different frameworks and the paradigms underlying them.

The Department of Health uses different WIES prices for different types of hospitals to recognise differences in levels of specialisation, remoteness and economies-of-scale.

But it is genuinely democratic, while recognising differences in standards of creativity and of response.

….. Some informants highlighted how, if they either had employees or customers in their country of origin, and they were operating their business in the UK it was important to understand and recognise differences in both cultures.

Only a single histological section was examined which may have resulted in a failure to recognise differences in adjacent tissue.