The phrase "reciprocal attitude" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to an attitude or mindset that involves mutual give-and-take or equal exchange between two or more parties. Example: In order to have a successful and harmonious relationship, it is important for both partners to maintain a reciprocal attitude, considering each other's needs and wants.
The idea is that collective intentionality is not a combination of individual intentionality and reciprocal attitudes, but irreducibly collective (cf. Searle 1995: 27).
If collective intentionality is analyzed in terms of a combination of individual intentionality and mutual recognition of some sorts, it seems that an infinite progress of reciprocal attitudes is immediately set off.
Moreover, the relationship between attitudes and achievement appears to be reciprocal: positive attitudes result in higher levels of achievement, which lead to attitudes that are even more positive (Marsh et al. 2005; Mullis et al. 2006; Retelsdorf et al. 2011; Valentine et al. 2004).
However, this instability can be avoided by making two assumptions: high degree of fun, i.e. articles are read with high probability, and different attitudes to reciprocal and non-reciprocal agents.
"We've gone from reciprocal finger-pointing to an attitude of shared responsibility for a problem that by nature is bilateral".
The Mohists' case here is reasonably persuasive, provided we keep in mind that they are focusing on the practice of reciprocal benefit, not the psychological attitude of equal concern, and that the practical demands of inclusive care are not especially taxing.
It is true that the semantic style of linguistic action in the long run enacts interpersonal relations: people living together and habitually interacting do tend to develop reciprocal forms of behaviour and attitudes.
In this reciprocal interaction, managers and employees' attitudes towards, theories about, and expectations on leadership, appear to play a crucial role for the realization of leadership practice (Lord et al. 1999).
The effect of marital homogamy is stronger among Fundamentalists, even with controls imposed for secular variables, such as labor-force participation, and when the reciprocal effect of the spouse's attitude toward the marriage is taken into account.
Zethraes et al [104] find no significant effect of estrogen or testosterone treatment in a group of post-menopausal women on any behaviors measured in a series of economic experiments including altruism, reciprocal fairness, trust, trustworthiness, and risk attitudes.
