recipients sensitivity

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "recipients sensitivity" is not correct in written English.
It should be "recipient's sensitivity" to indicate possession. Example: "We must consider the recipient's sensitivity when delivering feedback to ensure it is well-received."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

A similar experiment was performed recently on humans by researchers in the Netherlands: when the contents of a lean donor's microbiota were transferred to the guts of male patients with metabolic syndrome, the researchers found striking improvements in the recipients' sensitivity to insulin, an important marker for metabolic health.

The New York Times - Magazine

The research team measured hand recipients' sensitivity to touch in a systematic manner.

Science Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

CFU-E from BM or spleen of these recipients showed increased sensitivity to Epo, with about 25 30% of CFU-E growing in the absence of exogenous Epo (Figure 1H), demonstrating the presence of EEC in the polycythemic mice.

Plosone

Amongst all methods used, linear SVM, radial SVM and LR have the highest sensitivity in identifying recipients with DGF (83.8, 88.8 and 85.5 %, respectively), at the expense of identifying recipients without DGF (72.0, 57.9 and 65.0 %, respectively).

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

LDA and QDA already have higher sensitivity in identifying recipients with DGF (27.6 and 37.6 %, respectively) and only slightly lower sensitivity in identifying recipients without DGF (94.7 and 89.9 %, respectively), resulting in higher discriminative capacity (AUROC of 82.2 and 79.6 %, respectively).

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

In our study, linear SVM, radial SVM and LR have the highest sensitivity in identifying recipients with DGF (83.8, 88.8 and 85.5 %, respectively).

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Recently, the role of gut microbiota in the pathophysiology of insulin resistance and obesity was demonstrated because the transfer of lean microbiota increased insulin sensitivity in male recipients with metabolic syndrome.

Gut Microbes

The neurological assessment revealed small improvements in light touch and pin prick sensitivity in one transplant recipient anteriorly and posteriorly.

Brain

Lymphoma cells were used for either transplantation into C57BL/6-recipient mice for in vivo drug sensitivity analysis or for in vitro culture to obtain stable lymphoma cell lines.

Cell Death and Disease

A study led by Ekstrand et al. (33) in 1992 has shown reduced insulin sensitivity in 10 kidney transplant recipients with NGT compared with 10 healthy control subjects.

Diabetes Care

The histoplasma serology was negative in our patient, as the test is known to have a poor sensitivity in solid organ transplant recipients, especially in acute cases [ 4].

CKJ: Clinical Kidney Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the possessive form "recipient's sensitivity" or rephrase as "sensitivity of the recipient" for grammatical correctness.

Common error

Do not use "recipients sensitivity" as it incorrectly implies that multiple recipients collectively possess the sensitivity. Use the singular possessive form "recipient's sensitivity" or the alternative phrasing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase primarily functions as a noun phrase attempting to describe a quality or characteristic associated with the receiver of something. However, it is grammatically flawed, and as Ludwig AI reports it is not correct in written English. The corrected version, "recipient's sensitivity", functions as a noun phrase indicating possession.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

24%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "recipients sensitivity" appears in some sources, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests correcting it to "recipient's sensitivity" or rephrasing as "sensitivity of the recipient". The phrase aims to express the degree of sensitivity a recipient has or the importance of being considerate towards recipients. Given its prevalent use in scientific and news contexts, maintaining grammatical accuracy is crucial for a professional and clear communication. Consider using alternatives like "recipient's level of sensitivity" for better clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

recipient's sensitivity

Uses the possessive form to correctly indicate that the sensitivity belongs to the recipient.

sensitivity of the recipient

Rephrases to use a prepositional phrase, clarifying the relationship between sensitivity and the recipient.

recipient's level of sensitivity

Adds 'level of' to quantify and specify the degree of sensitivity.

sensitivity toward recipients

Focuses on the action of being sensitive towards recipients, shifting the emphasis.

sensitivity to recipients

Highlights the sensitivity directed to recipients.

understanding recipients' needs

Emphasizes understanding as a component of sensitivity.

awareness of recipients' feelings

Focuses on being aware of the emotional state of recipients.

consideration for recipients

Stresses the act of considering the recipients' circumstances and feelings.

responsiveness to recipients

Highlights the ability to respond appropriately to recipients' needs.

empathy for recipients

Emphasizes the emotional connection and understanding of recipients' experiences.

FAQs

What is the correct way to refer to the sensitivity related to a recipient?

The correct way is to use "recipient's sensitivity", indicating the sensitivity belongs to a single recipient, or "sensitivity of the recipient", which is another grammatically sound option.

Is "recipients sensitivity" grammatically correct?

No, "recipients sensitivity" is not grammatically correct. The correct form is "recipient's sensitivity", which uses the possessive form to show the sensitivity belongs to the recipient.

What are some alternatives to "recipients sensitivity" that are grammatically sound?

Alternatives include "recipient's sensitivity", "the sensitivity of the recipient", or phrases emphasizing understanding like "awareness of recipients' feelings".

When should I use "recipient's sensitivity" versus "sensitivity to recipients"?

"Recipient's sensitivity" is used to describe the degree to which a particular recipient is sensitive. "Sensitivity to recipients" refers to a general attitude or approach of being sensitive towards recipients as a group.