Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
That the recipients could easily afford to pay for the items does not matter.
There was one condition: The recipients could not be well off.
Recipients could use the account for savings, access payment products and apply for credit and insurance.
Welfare recipients could not cash cheques because city offices were closed.
Recipients could use vouchers at any facility, spiritual or secular, that has a worthwhile program.
The welfare changes, affecting hundreds of thousands of recipients, could stir more unrest.
It would also limit the time those recipients could get benefits to three months.
Without it, the recipients could not afford an essential, lifesaving service.
(Recipients could still do the paying, but that would cost 2 pence).
The bill proposes that W-visa recipients could eventually become citizens and would have work rights for their family members.
E-transfers also helped village-level businesses recover as recipients could choose where to spend their money.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com