Sentence examples for recipient when compared to from inspiring English sources

Experimental findings supporting this notion were that allo- and xenogenic (from different species) tissue grafts, when transplanted into the CNS are much less efficiently rejected by the recipient when compared to transplantation to orthotopic (original) sites.

In addition, bone marrow from older humans is less efficient at reconstituting recipients when compared to the reconstitution capacity of bone marrow derived from younger patients [ 49].

In contrast, a decline in RGC density was not observed in the retinas of B6 splenocyte recipients when compared to naïve mice (p = 0.99), demonstrating that RGC loss is not initiated by splenocyte transfer itself.

The number of cells stained by the anti-CD8 mAb was markedly reduced in skin tissue transplanted onto Tg recipients, when compared to those transplanted onto control animals (Fig. 7).

The incidence of spontaneous abortion (37% versus 7%) and preterm delivery (63% versus 18%) were significantly higher in TBI recipients when compared to the chemotherapy-only group (P = 0.01).

Furthermore, A. fumigatus particles exhibited greater persistence in the lungs of recipient mice when compared to non-viable A. fumigatus or A. versicolor, and this correlated with increased maintenance of airway memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells.

In contrast, transfer of CD19+ B-lymphocytes from nee mice only resulted in a moderate reduction of RGC density in recipient animals when compared to mice having received CD19+ B-lymphocytes from B6 mice (1968 ± 317 RGC/mm vs. 2259 ± 266 RGC/mm, respectively, p = 0.12, Fig.  3b).

Although fecundity (pups born per litter) was unaffected by BM-INF, the survival of offspring born to 13-17.5-month-old BM-INF recipients was far superior when compared to that of offspring delivered by age-matched VEH-INF females.

35% of C4d+ recipients had 2 DR mismatches when compared to 36% of C4d− recipients.

Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was more likely in RIC PB and NMA conditioned recipients (almost all of whom received PBSC) when compared to MA conditioned recipients and least likely with RIC conditioned recipients who received BM.

Our refined knotless method improved recipient survival to 67.5% when compared to the standard technique (53.8%).