Suggestions(1)
Similar(60)
Fifty-one (32.3%) individuals felt that living donor and recipient interaction was necessary.
Planned comparisons indicated that citalopram did not affect hyperaltruism (drug × recipient interaction, F 1,87) = 0.016, p = 0.90; Figure 2B).
Accordingly, subjects tended to deliver fewer shocks to others than themselves on placebo, but not levodopa (drug × recipient interaction, F 1,84) = 3.048, p = 0.084).
By contrast, levodopa reduced hyperaltruism (drug × recipient interaction, F 1,84) = 4.358, p = 0.040; Figures 2C and 2D), to the extent that subjects in the levodopa group did not show significantly greater harm aversion for others than for self (t(42) = 0.497, p = 0.622).
Nevertheless these services remain under-utilized by carers [ 2] and the dynamics of carer and care-recipient interactions in relation to respite services are poorly understood and under theorized.
The frequency distributions for the dominant and non-dominant units were calculated and a chi-square test was used to test whether these distributions differed in unit-unit interaction and unit-recipient interaction.
To evaluate this hypothesis, we analyzed the genetic variations of SDF1 and CXCR4 with regard to donor-recipient genetic interactions in kidney transplantation.
The transfer process depends on the gradient of P-gp expression in the donor-recipient cell interactions, as they evolve over time.
To control for potential recipients of interactions, we exclusively analysed observation sessions with at least two individuals present within a distance of ⩽16 m because previous observations demonstrated that hamsters at larger distances did not interact (Franceschini-Zink, unpublished data; Siutz, personal observation).
The nature and value of gifts range widely from an inexpensive bag of food to premium cigarettes based on the relative social status of the giver and recipient, previous gifting interactions between parties, and expectations of reciprocity from the recipient [ 3, 11].
For each record of aggressive interaction, we distinguished the initiator and recipient of the interaction as well as its intensity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com