"recipient company" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to the entity that will receive something. For example, "The recipient company is responsible for receiving the product shipment."
"Collection under this program was a compulsory legal process, that any recipient company would receive".
"The exporter and recipient company demonstrated that the chemicals were for a legitimate civilian end-use – which was for metal finishing of aluminium profiles used in making aluminium showers and aluminium window frames".
In this paper, we propose a structural equation model (SEM) to evaluate the performance of such a funding program in terms of three aspects: output, outcome and impact under given funding inputs, R&D environment of a recipient company, and external evaluation programs of funding organization.
The paper argues that successful technology transfer in a smaller economy like Chile requires: a minimum internal demand and access to regional markets to attract foreign knowledge providers; a focus in the types of technologies where the recipient country or company have a competitive advantage; and active learning processes by the recipient company.
· Making any beneficial tax treatment conditional on a recipient company having broad-based employee stock ownership and profit sharing plans.
The exporter and recipient company demonstrated that the chemicals were for a legitimate civilian end use - which was for metal finishing of aluminium profiles used in making aluminium showers and aluminium window frames.
We adopt Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) criteria to assess the R&D environmental factors of recipient companies.
That language was in two subpoenas that people representing the recipient companies allowed a reporter to read, on the condition that the companies not be identified.
But if the commission finds that illegal aid was given, governments can be ordered to recover the money from the recipient companies.
Subsidies are popular with recipient companies; with greens, who reckon that any money used to combat climate change is well spent; and with governments, which like handing out taxpayers' money.
The results are certainly interesting, possibly even important, but assuming that only half of the résumés were even looked at, and those for only 10 minutes each, the cost to the recipient companies was about $70,000.
