Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
Receptive speech subtest requires revision.
The Receptive Speech subtest was the only one insensible to detect any changes with age.
Regarding item-total correlation, Receptive Speech subtest is the one with least contribution to internal consistency.
Maximum, MS motor skill, RY rhythm, TS tactile skill, VS visual skill, RS receptive speech, ES expressive speech, WR writing, RE reading, MR mathematical reasoning, IM immediate memory.
The low contribution of Receptive Speech to internal consistency comes alongside the other findings about this subtest, which indicates psychometric inadequacy in its present configuration.
Age effects were found for all subtests and in the general score, except for receptive speech subtest, even when total IQ effect was controlled.
Similar(49)
Rare mutations of FOXP2 have been described in individuals having expressive and receptive language and speech deficits generally described as developmental verbal dyspraxia (Hurst, et al., 1990; Lai, et al., 2001; MacDermot, et al., 2005; Marshall, et al., 2008).
Although several studies report no significant findings, problems with language expression appear to confer medium to large magnitude effect sizes for increased risk of both SSD and AP, whereas receptive language deficits and speech problems may be antecedent only to SSD.
The XXX female proband had articulation difficulties without receptive language delay and was receiving speech and language therapy at a language unit attached to a mainstream school.
Cases were defined as having an expressive (on both speech and syntax subscales) or receptive language score (the WOLD comprehension subtest) at least 1.5 SD below the mean of the entire ALSPAC cohort (after the preliminary filtering).
Therefore, the final group of children exhibited severe SLI with/without concomitant speech impairment, where expressive and/or receptive language proficiency scores fell greater than 2SD below the test mean.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com