Sentence examples for recently held that from inspiring English sources

The Supreme Court recently held that prisoners taken in the war against terror are entitled to habeas corpus review in the federal courts.

The U.S. District Court in Colorado recently held that Miami Nations' tribal sovereign immunity applied to both governmental and commercial activities (Colorado v. Cash Advance).

A ruling handed down by a lower court in Pennsylvania recently held that sexual orientation discrimination falls under the Civil Rights Act, according to Anthony Kreis, a professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law who studies LGBT rights.

Nonetheless, the House of Lords recently held that SCNT produces a functional embryo that falls within the ambit of this Act (in effect, holding that the Act's definition of embryo is non-exhaustive and restricted in purpose) [ 18].

While it's true that a federal judge recently held that the Police Department routinely violated constitutional protections, that is a radical stomp of an analogy.

But the federal appeals court in New York recently held that Connecticut's sex-offender registration and notification law violated the constitutional guarantee of due process, a separate issue that is not before the Supreme Court in the Alaska case.

Over the years, more than 30 other Abel fictions -- treated as fact by news publications and television and radio programs -- included a school for panhandlers, a bogus lottery winner and, most recently, Citizens Against Breast Feeding, which held that breast feeding caused oral fixations in infants, leading to adult smoking.

GHash went over the 50% mark recently, and held that rate for a period of more than 12 hours, it became generally known on Friday.

The group, in conjunction with Flux Factory, also plans to repeat "Long Walks on the Beach," an event recently held at Far Rockaway, Queens, that paired random strangers for exactly that.

Until very recently, common wisdom held that breakfast was the most important meal of the day.

More recently, courts have held that merely by adopting a written policy that warns employees that their e-mail may be monitored, employers will lower expectations of privacy in a way that gives them virtually unlimited discretion to monitor e-mail.