recent to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "recent to" is not correct and usable in written English.
It is not a standard expression and may lead to confusion in meaning. Example: "The findings were recent to the study, indicating a need for further research."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Margot has little patience with Gwen's prolonged widowhood, which still feels recent to Gwen: " 'Recently'?

The New York Times - Books

224 years more recent to be precise.

The Guardian - Film

Emily Barr is the most recent to join the club.

The Guardian

South Sudan was the most recent to be welcomed, in July.

The New Yorker

Kathleen Loepker, a millwright and mechanic, is among the most recent to join their ranks.

The New York Times

The pay of the nation's top earners has become the most recent to fall behind inflation.

The New York Times

Nearly all then dip into history, distant or recent, to add a dimension or two.

The New York Times - Books

Rooney agreed that the fingerprint appeared too recent to have come from Pollock.

The New Yorker

But the euro's depreciation is too recent to have made much difference yet.

The Guardian - Business

The rise in texting is too recent to have produced any conclusive data on health effects.

The New York Times - Health

The most recent to achieve it was Affirmed in 1978, but since then 11 have tried.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating a temporal relationship, use established phrases like "recently related to" or "newly associated with" for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "recent to" as a substitute for established expressions. This phrase lacks grammatical support and may confuse readers. Opt for clearer alternatives like "recently related to" or "in recent times".

Linguistic Context

While the individual words are clear, the phrase "recent to" does not function as a standard grammatical unit, according to Ludwig AI. It attempts to establish a temporal relationship, but its non-standard usage makes it less effective and potentially confusing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "recent to" appears in a variety of sources, its usage is not grammatically sound and may lead to confusion. Ludwig AI identifies it as a non-standard expression. Therefore, it is recommended to use clearer and more established alternatives like "recently related to", "newly associated with", or "close to" to ensure your writing is both accurate and easily understood. Despite its presence in news and scientific contexts, it's best to avoid this phrase in Formal and Scientific or Professional writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

close to

Indicates proximity in time or relationship, differing from "recent to" by emphasizing nearness rather than a temporal sequence.

newly

Focuses on the newness or novelty of something, unlike "recent to" which suggests a relationship with a point in time.

just

Implies immediacy or a very short time ago, differing in nuance from the broader temporal range of "recent to".

up-to-date

Emphasizes currency or the latest information, differing from the relational aspect of "recent to".

of late

Indicates something happening recently, but it's more formal and less direct than "recent to".

in recent times

Highlights a period rather than a specific connection, offering a broader perspective than "recent to".

lately

Similar to "of late" but more common, referring to actions or events in the near past.

in the past few

Specifies a timeframe, unlike the more general connection implied by "recent to".

new to

Indicates unfamiliarity or the start of something, deviating from the temporal linkage of "recent to".

just now

Implies something happened very recently. It's more specific than the relational aspect of "recent to".

FAQs

What does "recent to" mean?

The phrase "recent to" is not a standard English expression and its meaning can be unclear. It's often intended to indicate something that happened or is related to a recent event or time.

What can I say instead of "recent to"?

Consider using phrases like "recently related to", "newly associated with", or "close to" depending on the context. These alternatives provide greater clarity and grammatical correctness.

Is "recent to" grammatically correct?

No, "recent to" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use more established phrases to convey your intended meaning.

How can I use "recently related to" in a sentence?

You could say, "The findings were recently related to the study, indicating a need for further research." This clarifies the temporal connection and is grammatically sound.