Sentence examples for receiver table from inspiring English sources
The geographic location (latitude and longitude), altitude, and orientation of each population were taken with a global positioning system receiver (Table 1).
Other fixed factors like sex and kin did not influence the behavior of the receiver (Table 2).
This system consists of three transmitters with a fixed highly precise frequency of ~6.57 MHz and two receivers; Table 1 lists their locations.
A donor score was calculated to determine whether individuals engaged in transfers acted predominantly as donors or receivers (Table 1).
Figure 8 shows the vertical position errors of each receiver, and Table 4 summarizes the mean and standard deviation values of the corresponding position errors during static (0– 16 s) and dynamic (16 30 s) periods.
The reason for this is that the transmitted average power of the continuous wave radar is lower, and the thermal noise relevant to the operating bandwidth and the radar's structure design, so the signal detection threshold of continuous wave radar is lower, and this demands higher receiver sensitivity (Table 1).
As shown in Figures 10 and 11, based on the parameters of a receiver in Table 2 we present the simulated impulse responses as a function of arrival time traced with number of bounces = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, for configurations D and E, respectively.
Of the six detection probability sub-models evaluated across all years, the strongest support by far was found in sub-model (v), which involved line- and year-specific estimates with an additive term for tag size and an additive term for river level at the Mission gauge during the mean time of arrival of populations on receiver lines (Table 1).
Hybrid kinases were also enriched for multiple receiver domains (Table 6), with 1113 of 4650 hybrid kinases possessing 2 or more receiver domains.
A small proportion (1.4%) of RRs possessed multiple receiver domains (Table 6), generally two (301 examples), but three in 14 cases.
Area under the receiver operating curve (Table 3) was 0.66.
