received no compensation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "received no compensation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when stating that someone did not receive any payment or reward for their work or services. Example: "After completing the project, I was disappointed to find that I received no compensation for my efforts."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Physicians were compensated €40 per included and fully documented patient, while patients received no compensation.

European Journal of Health Economics

Physicians were compensated 40 Euro per included and fully documented patient, while patients received no compensation.

BMC Health Services Research

They say they have received no compensation.

The Economist

He received no compensation, he pointed out.

The New York Times

Professors received no compensation from defendants.

Stanford University

"We have received no compensation payment," he said.

Independent

Disclosure note | I received no compensation for this appearance.

The New York Times

I still have received no compensation for that.

The New York Times - Health

(I received no compensation for my role there).

The New York Times

Mr. Gonzalez received no compensation for his service.

The New York Times

Two claimants, a Frenchman and a Moroccan, received no compensation.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the formality of your writing. While "received no compensation" is generally suitable, more formal options like "received no remuneration" may be more appropriate in academic or legal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "received no compensation" when the correct term should be reimbursement. Compensation refers to payment for services, while reimbursement refers to repayment for expenses incurred.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "received no compensation" primarily functions as a statement of fact, indicating that an individual or entity did not receive any payment or reward for their services, efforts, or losses. According to Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically sound and frequently used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

47%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "received no compensation" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate the absence of payment or reward. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's versatile enough for various contexts, ranging from news reports and scientific articles to academic papers. While generally neutral in tone, more formal alternatives may suit specific professional or legal contexts. When using this phrase, ensure the context clearly defines the expected compensation. Common errors include confusing compensation with reimbursement. In summary, "received no compensation" is a reliable way to convey that payment was not provided.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not paid

Focuses directly on the lack of payment, suitable for simple, direct statements.

did not get paid

More informal way of saying "was not paid", emphasizing the action of not receiving payment.

obtained no payment

More formal and emphasizes the act of obtaining or not obtaining payment.

did not receive remuneration

Similar to "was unremunerated", focusing on the lack of formal compensation.

received no remuneration

Formal synonym indicating the absence of financial compensation.

was unremunerated

A more formal and less common term indicating the lack of payment for services.

got nothing in return

Broader, implying a lack of any form of reward, not just monetary.

volunteered without pay

Highlights the voluntary nature of the work and the absence of payment.

was not reimbursed

Specifically refers to not being repaid for expenses or losses.

worked pro bono

Indicates providing services without charge, often for charitable purposes.

FAQs

What does "received no compensation" mean?

It means that someone did not receive any payment or reward for their work, services, or losses. It indicates a lack of financial or material return for something provided.

What can I say instead of "received no compensation"?

You can use alternatives like "was not paid", "did not get paid", or "obtained no payment" depending on the formality and context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "received no compensation"?

Yes, "received no compensation" is grammatically correct and widely used in both formal and informal contexts to indicate a lack of payment or reward.

What's the difference between "received no compensation" and "was not reimbursed"?

"Received no compensation" indicates a lack of payment for services rendered, while "was not reimbursed" means that someone was not repaid for expenses they incurred.