Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
To date, nine project teams targeting patients with various conditions have received methodological and financial support for the design and evaluation of these innovative interventions.
Similar(59)
Throughout the process, the participants could receive methodological support through the computer program itself and via e-mail.
All these reviews received a methodological score of 4.5 or lower, indicating a high chance of "extensive" or "major" flaws.
Whilst multiple studies in this review [41, 63, 64, 76, 77] use acute response designs and receive poor methodological quality rating, they may have some generalizable merit for sports medicine and science readers.
One cross-sectional study demonstrated a strong methodological quality, five cross-sectional studies demonstrated a moderate methodological quality and three studies (two cross-sectional one longitudinal) received a weak methodological quality rating.
Overall, one cross-sectional study [ 31] demonstrated a strong methodological quality, five cross-sectional studies [ 30, 33– 36] demonstrated a moderate methodological quality and three studies (two cross-sectional [ 29, 32], one longitudinal [ 37]) received a weak methodological quality rating.
Usability methods have received relatively little methodological attention within the field of E-Government.
In general, most FHS questionnaires reported on in this study received poor overall methodological quality scores per measurement domain.
As already described, the Grimshaw review received a high methodological score, namely 7, on the checklist used.
Although they all received a high methodological quality score, their findings cannot be easily compared or generalised.
This integrative approach seems to offer the best chance, at least in theory, of genuinely accessing the strengths of both the empirical and the philosophical contributions, and through our engagement with the field to date we felt that it is the approach that has received the most methodological attention, is the most heterogeneous, and is most in need of systematic review.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com