Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
To compare the clinical outcomes of young-old patients (aged 60 74 years) and old-old patients (aged 75 years and older) who received collaborative care management for depression.
The third group received collaborative advice and a pedometer.
The age of children who received collaborative care ranged from 48 – 153 months (X = 96.3 months) and 877575%) were male.
The mean depression score at follow-up was 0.23 points lower (95% confidence interval −0.41 to −0.05) in participants who received collaborative care compared with those who received usual care, after adjustment for baseline depression and minimisation variables (table 3).
Second, the number of children who were suspected of having DCD, referred to OT, received collaborative care and were given a diagnosis of DCD, is regarded as a measure of the effectiveness of the educational outreach.
Similar(55)
Participants receiving collaborative care were significantly more satisfied with treatment than those receiving usual care.
The patients in the intervention group will receive collaborative care from a consultative psychiatric nurse (CPN) and a psychiatrist in the department of psychiatry of the participating hospital.
Using these metrics, it is particularly noteworthy that at 12 months, 56% of participants receiving collaborative care "recovered"—15% more than in usual care.
Notably, the first physician visit occurred a median of 3 days post-discharge and 75%% of patients were seen within 7 days among those receiving collaborative care.
In CADET, 44% of participants receiving collaborative care had scores that remained above the PHQ-9 depression threshold at 12 month follow-up.
To evaluate the cost utility of each condition, the difference in direct medical costs per patient receiving collaborative care and duloxetine, collaborative care and placebo, or Duloxetine alone is related to the difference in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years QALYY) gained.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com