received 3 months

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "received 3 months" is not correct in written English as it lacks context and clarity.
It could be used in a context where you are referring to something that was received over a period of three months, but it needs additional information to be clear. Example: "The package was received over the course of 3 months, arriving in several shipments."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Objective: To report a successful pregnancy in a woman with panhypopituitarism who received 3 months of pretreatment with growth hormone (GH) before ovulation induction.

Fertility and Sterility

Retreatment cases received 3 months of intensive treatment and 5 months of continuation treatment according to the following regimen: 2SHRZE/1HRZE/5HRE.

Plosone

Of all the patients, 142 AS patients and 47 RA patients received 3 months anti-TNF-α treatment after recruitment.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Information on TE events occurring after cancer diagnosis, the type of anticoagulant used, treatment received 3 months prior to any TE events was collected.

Cancer Medicine

FIX-HF-4 was a randomized single-blind, cross-over study in which patients received 3 months of active therapy and 3 months received no therapy [ 34].

Heart Failure Reviews

If these forms had not been received 3 months past each participants' expected due date then a reminder letter was issued.

Child Development

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

The first received 33 months imprisonment and the second, two 20-month sentences.

Vice

Trainee psychiatric nurses received 9 months of training that involved a 3-month taught course and 6 months of internship.

Global Health Action

The man received 17 months.

The New York Times

This was finally received 15 months after the arrest.

The Guardian

Convicted, he received 27 months in federal prison.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing durations of treatment or engagement, clearly specify what was received and for how long. For example, use phrases like "received treatment for 3 months" instead of just "received 3 months".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "received 3 months" without clearly stating what was received. This lack of context can confuse the reader. Always clarify with specific details, such as "received 3 months of physical therapy".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "received 3 months" functions as an elliptical construction where the object of "received" is implied but not explicitly stated. Ludwig AI highlights the need for additional information to enhance clarity. It requires context to specify what was actually received.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "received 3 months" is grammatically questionable without additional context. While it appears across various domains like Science and News, it's important to specify what was received. As Ludwig AI highlights, clarifying the object of "received" – such as ""received 3 months of treatment"" – greatly improves clarity. Failing to do so can lead to ambiguity and misinterpretation. Therefore, strive for precision by always providing the necessary context to ensure your message is clear and effective. Using alternative phrases, as suggested, can also enhance understandability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

received treatment for 3 months

Adds 'treatment' to specify what was received, making the phrase more complete and grammatically sound.

3 months of treatment

Reorders the phrase to emphasize the duration and type of treatment.

received a 3-month treatment

Uses a hyphenated adjective to describe the treatment's duration.

treated for 3 months

Focuses on the duration of treatment, similar to the original phrase's intent in many contexts.

therapy for 3 months

Specifies 'therapy' as the thing received, clarifying the context.

was given 3 months of

Emphasizes the act of giving something over a period.

underwent 3 months of

Highlights the process experienced over a duration.

participated in 3 months of

Suggests involvement in an activity lasting three months.

enrolled for 3 months

Implies a period of enrollment or subscription.

benefited from 3 months of

Emphasizes the positive outcome from a three-month period.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the phrase "received 3 months" in a sentence?

To use the phrase correctly, specify what was received. For example, "The patient "received 3 months of treatment"" or "The project "received 3 months' funding"" are clearer and more grammatically sound.

What are some alternatives to "received 3 months" that provide more clarity?

Alternatives include "received treatment for 3 months", "underwent 3 months of therapy", or "3 months of support", depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "received 3 months" without specifying what was received?

While sometimes used, it's generally better to specify what was received to avoid ambiguity. Saying "received 3 months of training" is more precise than simply "received 3 months".

What is the difference between "received 3 months of treatment" and "treated for 3 months"?

"Received 3 months of treatment" emphasizes the act of receiving, while "treated for 3 months" focuses on the action of providing treatment over that duration. Both are grammatically sound and convey similar meanings but with slightly different emphasis.