"recalling section" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to refer to a specific section or part of a document, speech, or text that is specifically recalling or bringing attention to something previously mentioned. Example sentence: The concluding remarks in the professor's lecture focused on the importance of the recalling section in understanding the main concepts of the course.
Anyway, recalling (section 8.2), if λ-distribution is excluded as a matter of law, it will be impossible even in theory to exploit the violation of PI to give rise to superluminal signaling, in which case the possibility of relativistic parameter-dependent theories could not be discounted on the basis of superluminal signaling.
Recalling section 5.1, for a given set ( left({overline{t}}_j,{overline{t}}_i,{overline{t}}_kright) ), ( {widehat{x}}_{ij}left tilde{t}right) ) and ( {widehat{x}}_{ik}left tilde{t}right) ) are piecewise affine, continuous and monotonous (either increasing or decreasing).
It will not tell what the recall was for, however, or link directly to more information about it; for that, return to the recall section and start the search again.
Recall (section 5.1.2) that there are several models of state reduction in the literature.
As an illustration, consider Kitcher's treatment of the problem of explanatory asymmetries (recall Section 2.5).
Recall (section 5.3.3) that in Albert and Loewer's (1988) many-minds interpretation this is not the case.
While dualists think that zombies are metaphysically possible, they need not hold that zombies are nomologically possible (recall Section 3.1).
keeping in mind that N e =746 in this study (recall Section "Initialization of the geodynamo state for 2014.3").
Now, recall (section 5.3.1) that Bohm's theory reproduces the quantum statistics by postulating the quantum-equilibrium distribution over the positions of particles.
Recall (section 8) that many believe that parameter-dependent theories (i.e., theories that violate parameter independence) are more difficult or even impossible to reconcile with relativity.
It is not hard to see that this principle conflicts with Allais' preferences for the same reason these preferences conflict with Independence (recall Section 2.3).
