Sentence examples for reasoning to consider from inspiring English sources

We use some of the established knowledge about design and design reasoning to consider critically and to extend Whitbeck's design analogy.

This supports the reasoning to consider the use of a sympatholytic drug as an adjunct sedative in both high-risk patients before undergoing major surgery and in ICU patients prone to sepsis.

If, still on the issue of private-public administration, we take this positive line of reasoning, we need to consider first that the allocation of public rights, such as that of subsidies, is an issue that allows for various approaches, each having their own range of legitimate action.

This reasoning leads us to consider the two infection events hypothesis as the more plausible (fig. 9).

Our reasoning leads us to consider familial clustering of breast cancer prognosis as a possible biologic phenomenon rather than a consequence of confounding by factors such as awareness, screening behavior, or treatment.

Instead, it seems as if the macaques had difficulties to incorporate temporal information in their reasoning, that is, to consider (1) that only one board had changed its inclination after the hiding of the food, and (2) which of the two boards had changed.

But note that although the goal α ⊃ β does not match the conclusion of any other introduction rule, it matches the conclusion of all elimination rules and the reasoning program would need to consider those routes too.

Second, the crucial cases used to support supervenience like the embezzling banker case seem to involve conceivability reasoning: we are asked to consider two circumstances that are identical in all base respects, and notice that we cannot make sense of the idea that they differ in ethical respects.

By Mitchell's reasoning, the sole criterion to consider in regard to water boarding is whether the tool was properly applied.

After my initial rebuff, I began to consider his reasoning.

As John Roberts, the chief justice, pointed out, the court is obligated to consider any reasoning that would allow a law to stand even if the law's defenders didn't advance it.