This Addendum and some of the legal examples cited in the text provide evidence for the complex relationship—"uneasy bedfellows" in one view between science and the law, more specifically between the scientific method and scientific reasoning on the one hand and legal reasoning on the other hand.
If the good involves feeling the right way, how do we know that we are feeling the right way? ([ 58]: 172) Fabrice Jotterand also argues that "the emphasis on the control of moral emotions appears reductive and one-sided in the sense that it conflates moral reasoning (as practical reasoning) with moral psychology (how moral reasoning acts on one's motivational/emotional states)" ([ 49]: 5).
It argues that there is a polarisation between technically-oriented reasoning on the one hand, and socially-oriented reasoning on the other.
If we were to take translation at face value as an application of theoretical, normative conclusions in practice we would have to expect equal outcome in the conclusions reached by philosophical reasoning on the one side and practical reasoning on the matter on the other.
We feel such arguments often lead to circular reasoning based on one's expectation of what primitive cellular life should look like.
Repetition of this reasoning, based on One-over-Many, Self-Predication, and Non-Identity, then generates an infinite hierarchy of forms of largeness, with each form partaking of every form that lies above it in the hierarchy.
"We can all think of people that have poor reasoning and brilliant memories, or fantastic language skills but aren't so hot at reasoning, and so on," one of the paper's authors Dr. Roger Highfield told The Telegraph.
Models support inductive reasoning, in which one builds on the understanding of living organisms in general, based on observations made in a specific model organism [ 1].
Expressivity, together with a strong focus on DL reasoning is certainly one major distinctive criterion when comparing NTDO with OBO ontologies or the ontologies developed by Topalis et al. (2011) which represent a similar domain with a much higher coverage, but less expressive axiomatic content, with semantic annotation being their predominating raison d'être.
It merely establishes that they're better on one reasoning test.
