Sentence examples for reasoning literature from inspiring English sources

A review of analogical reasoning literature offers three techniques that may be useful in the development of effective analogies for phenomena at extreme scales.

Many recent phenomena in the moral reasoning literature demonstrate coherence-based reasoning, among them, the construction of morally culpable agents, the construction of victims and harms, and altered beliefs about the effectiveness and consequences of policies with moral implications.

The striving for moral coherence explains many seemingly contradictory patterns of judgment found in the moral reasoning literature, such as the general tendency for people to reverse engineer descriptive beliefs to fit desired prescriptive conclusions.

This tension between scientific 'evidence-based' thinking and intuitive thinking is suggested also by the clinical reasoning literature.

These five strategic processes of clinical reasoning were identified using the clinical reasoning literature and through consensus from three expert clinicians.

To a greater extent than the evidence-based movement, the clinical reasoning literature asserts the importance of practitioner intuition unconscious elements of diagnostic reasoning.

18 Although the medical decision making, evidence-based medicine and clinical reasoning literatures generally favour analytical reasoning over intuitive reasoning, modern neuroscience recognises the dynamic interplay and cross-checking between the intuitive (system 1) and analytical (system 2) cognitive systems in the dual process model and, in some cases, the superior performance of intuition.

In support of this line of reasoning, the literature reviewed suggests that cigarette smoking effects on all-cause mortality have only recently been observed in studies conducted after the introduction of HAART.

Analytical skills and content knowledge based assessments support the claim that students achieved the learning objectives and were able to apply their newly acquired abilities to address open-ended questions requiring experimental design, deductive reasoning, and literature-based analyses of experimental evidence.

The knowledgebase currently contains 52 alerts, 207 patterns, 138 reasoning rules, 79 literature sources, 5 species and 6 toxicity endpoints.

This suggests clinical reasoning involving research literature is possibly narrower and more descriptive than clinical reasoning involving evidence which is dynamic and involves process understandings.