Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
This paper discusses the use of non-deterministic analysis based on approximate reasoning for assessing falsework safety.
The design employs a service-based system that incorporates a number of services including monitoring of activities, nutritional reasoning for assessing feeding habits, diet recommendation for food planning, and marketplace invocation for automating food shopping to meet dietary requirements.
Our reasoning for assessing 15-min interval memory in our study was that the recall scores would be higher and more likely to demonstrate a larger difference, if one existed than if we used a longer interval period.
Similar(57)
We examine how tools from mathematics and artificial intelligence, developed for network modelling and reasoning, could be useful for assessing and enhancing ecosystems services.
This provides a tool for assessing clinical reasoning [ 4].
The script concordance test (SCT) is a method for assessing clinical reasoning of medical students in the context of uncertainty that characterizes their future daily practice [ 2- 6].
Current strategies for assessing clinical reasoning based on real life case studies include [ 19, 31, 32]: Key Features Question [ 33 – 35 ] - key features are those essential for resolving a problem.
The script concordance test (SCT) is a method for assessing clinical reasoning of medical students by placing them in a context of uncertainty such as they will encounter in their future daily practice.
Traditional tools for assessing clinical reasoning, i.e. multiple choice questions (MCQ) correctly and reliably test the ability of students to apply well-known solutions to well defined problems.
Traditional tools for assessing clinical reasoning, such as rich-context, multiple choice questions (MCQ) [ 3], extended matching questions (EMQ) [ 4] correctly and reliably test the ability of students to apply well-known solutions from EBM to well defined problems.
The use of an oral exam based on simulated cases has been reported to be a reliable [ 42] and valid [ 43] method for assessing clinical reasoning when the case scenarios and marking criteria are consistently applied.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com