Sentence examples for reasoning about how to from inspiring English sources

Hume is particularly concerned with analyzing our practical reasoning, our reasoning about how to act.

Among those attributes are the consciousness of oneself as a temporally-extended being; practical rationality the capacity to govern one's actions by reasoning about how to act; and the capacity to make and respond to moral demands.

It involves sensing the world (knowing where you are, where you want to go and what obstacles lie in your path), formulating a plan (reasoning about how to move and navigate safely), and executing planned actions (taking steps to circumvent or traverse obstacles in order to safely reach the goal location).

As this entry seeks to illuminate the role of coherence in legal reasoning, the emphasis here is on coherence accounts of adjudication, and on examining the role which coherence plays in courts' reasoning about how to decide cases according to law.

Critics of the classical argument question this assumption, contending that when reasoning about how to move at any of his information sets, including those not on the backwards induction equilibrium path, part of what an agent must consider is what conditions might have led to his being at that information set.

But regardless of how one answers that question, it is widely accepted that potentially blameworthy agents must be capable of reflecting upon, reasoning about, and executing a decision about how to behave.

Much needs to be learnt about how to cultivate and develop this type of reasoning in students' (p. 84).

Thus, access to ECHO ought to be accompanied by education about how to integrate this information better in the diagnostic reasoning.

As far as I could make it out, Feinberg's reasoning in these cases amounted to: Let's do what seems to work, and worry about how to justify it afterward.

One of the aims of our commentary was to encourage more careful thinking about how to promote transparency regarding a wide range of different factors that could influence scientists' reasoning, including ideology.

Interviews explored their recall and understanding of trial information, and their reasoning about how they were allocated to a treatment.