Lobachevsky and Bolyai reasoned about the hypothesis of the acute angle in the manner of Saccheri and Lambert and recovered their results about the areas of triangles.
Serious methodological caveats related to these comparisons have been extensively discussed, including small samples, variation in rate of immigration in the areas samples, and the lack of a reasoned biologically plausible hypothesis linking immigration to autism [Fombonne, 2005].
Dittrich [3], [4] reasoned that if this hypothesis could not be falsified for a broad range of ASC induction methods, integration of phenomenological, psychophysiological, and neurobiological research on ASC would be greatly enhanced.
We reasoned that, if the hypothesis that inter-segment differences in surface area, skin temperature and rate of movement affect heat balance during locomotion is correct, the estimates yielded by the two methods should be statistically significantly different.
We reasoned that, under this hypothesis, increasing levels of resolution (i.e. when considering phenotypes, haplotypes and haplotypes with their molecular distances) should lead to increasing values of the corresponding fixation index, due to the ongoing molecular radiation paralleling populations splits and dispersals.
We therefore reasoned that, if this hypothesis is correct, addition of exogenous ANG to serum-free medium should be able to restore cell viability.
Having thus confirmed our hypothesis, we reasoned that the highly ranked genes that were not even marginally associated with type 2 diabetes in a GWAS might also be relevant to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes.
One way to test these hypotheses, Batson reasoned, is to see if participants cared about whether the flipping of the coin and so the task assignment was done by themselves or by the experimenter.
