Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(52)
American courts have a rule called "judicial notice" that addresses false assertions and allows one of the parties in the lawsuit to request that proven facts be introduced into evidence when those facts are not subject to reasonable dispute because they are generally known or cannot reasonably be questioned.
The justices decide on their own when their "impartiality might reasonably be questioned".
"If the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned, that creates a perception problem".
Under federal law, judges must recuse themselves from cases when their impartiality "might reasonably be questioned".
Recusal is warranted "when the judge's impartiality may reasonably be questioned," Mr. Kaufman said.
In a ruling today, the appeals court said Scheindlin's statements suggested that her "impartiality might reasonably be questioned".
Similar(8)
Including those, 25 had some conflict where their impartiality could reasonably have been questioned.
Unless the facts are so clear that only one inference may reasonably be drawn, mixed questions of law and fact are for the jury.
The law says a justice "shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be called into question".
The difficulty is that any scientific answer to this last question would reasonably be thought to beg the very question it purports to address.
For example, no one in the study can reasonably be considered unexposed, raising questions about whether there is adequate exposure variability to detect effects.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com