reaffirmed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reaffirmed by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been confirmed or supported again by a person, organization, or document. Example: "The findings of the study were reaffirmed by subsequent research conducted in the same field."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

This resolution was reaffirmed by the General Assembly in 1977.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"It's good to get reaffirmed by the people.

The New Yorker

That status was reaffirmed by the I.R.S. as part of its settlement with the company.

The New York Times

Paul's teachings on clerical celibacy were reaffirmed by Pope John Paul II.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Credit that in part to the cast, whose brilliance is only reaffirmed by the boxed set.

The New York Times - Arts

Oregon's aid in dying law, reaffirmed by voters in 1997, has been a remarkably successful experiment.

The New York Times

The limits were imposed after a 1993 referendum and were reaffirmed by voters in 1996.

The New York Times

Photograph: Bloomberg 8.50am GMT Germany saw its AAA credit rating reaffirmed by Standard & Poor's this morning.

The Guardian - Business

One of those faulty narratives was reaffirmed by someone seeking to be their commander-in-chief.

The Guardian

That message was reaffirmed by the British defense minister, Bob Ainsworth.

The New York Times

M. Hardy's aesthetics of disinvitation are reaffirmed by the fact that there does not appear to be an actual door.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "reaffirmed by" to emphasize that something has been previously stated or established and is being confirmed again, often after a challenge or period of uncertainty.

Common error

Avoid using "reaffirmed by" when the context only requires a simple confirmation or validation. Overusing it can make your writing sound repetitive. Consider using alternatives such as "confirmed by" or "supported by" for initial confirmations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reaffirmed by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a statement, decision, or principle has been confirmed or supported again by a specific entity. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is widely accepted and used across numerous contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reaffirmed by" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that indicates a renewed confirmation or validation of something previously stated or established. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for various contexts, especially in news, scientific, and encyclopedia sources. When employing this phrase, ensure that the context genuinely warrants the emphasis on repeated confirmation rather than a simple validation. Using alternatives like "confirmed by" or "validated by" can help avoid redundancy. Overall, "reaffirmed by" is a valuable tool for highlighting the ongoing validity and support for ideas or agreements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

confirmed by

Focuses on initial validation rather than repeated confirmation.

validated by

Emphasizes the establishment of truth or accuracy through evidence.

endorsed by

Implies approval and support, often from a recognized authority.

upheld by

Suggests a formal decision or judgment supporting a previous statement or action.

ratified by

Indicates formal approval, typically by a governing body.

sustained by

Highlights ongoing support or maintenance of something.

corroborated by

Emphasizes the provision of additional evidence to support a claim.

re-established by

Highlights the act of setting something up again or in a new form.

seconded by

Implies support from another party in agreement.

re-authorized by

Suggests renewed permission or approval for something.

FAQs

How is "reaffirmed by" different from "confirmed by"?

"Reaffirmed by" implies a prior confirmation that is now being stated again, often after a period of doubt or challenge. "Confirmed by", on the other hand, simply means something is being validated, without necessarily having been previously confirmed.

What can I say instead of "reaffirmed by"?

You can use alternatives such as "confirmed by", "validated by", or "endorsed by", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is "reaffirmed by" appropriate for formal writing?

Yes, "reaffirmed by" is suitable for formal writing. Its use indicates a careful and considered restatement of something previously established, which is often desirable in formal contexts.

Can "reaffirmed by" be used when something is being disproven?

No, "reaffirmed by" is not appropriate when something is being disproven. It should only be used when something is being supported or confirmed again. If something is being disproven, consider using phrases like "challenged by" or "contradicted by".