Sentence examples for reads as compared from inspiring English sources

The library produced with the double-fragmentation method resulted in much more unique reads (1.93 M unique reads from 3.4 M mapped reads) as compared to the sample processed without secondary fragmentation (0.89 M unique reads from 3.4 M mapped reads), for this purpose when two or more reads have the same starting position on the same strand they were counted as single unique read.

Similar mapping behaviour of the Illumina reads as compared to PacBio reads was also observed in Ferrarini et al. [ 23].

It has been reported that the longer Roche 454 reads as compared to the Illumina reads, results in an improvement in mapping of repetitive regions [ 32].

The 107 potential novel miRNAs exhibited lower expression levels with the abundance ranging from five to 3,318 reads, as compared with known miRNAs.

For the de novo transcriptome sequencing we chose Roche 454 pyrosequencing because it generates longer reads as compared to the Illumina technology [ 16].

The comparison revealed that the S technology has 1.6 ± 0.2 (SEM) times better separation between species and retains 4.8 ± 0.5 times more reads as compared to Xenome combined with STAR alignment (Additional file 3: Figure S2).

Nebraska's Department of Education reports that 54% of Black or African American students demonstrate proficiency in reading as compared to the average of 77% for all students.

These screen/tech-use differences are a significant factor contributing to racial achievement disparities: According to the latest Nation's Report Card report, 16% of Black 8th graders are "proficient" in reading as compared with 44% of White students, and 13% of Black 8th graders are "proficient" in math as compared with 43% of White students.

Previous literature suggests that those with reading disability have more pronounced deficits during semantic processing in reading as compared to listening comprehension [1] [4].

Previous literature suggests that those with reading disability (RD) have more pronounced deficits during semantic processing in reading as compared to listening comprehension.

Bernadt, Gunning and Quenstedt investigated British patients' opinions of their own psychiatric records, and found that 28% of patients were upset by what they had read, as compared to only 4% who were upset by what had been said during their clinical interview [ 25].