Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
If a reader finds one of his characters implausible, he told me, he won't be able to dig into a pile of books in his office and prove that reader wrong: "I feel much more naked, for lack of a better word".
No, wait, you're a TechCrunch reader, wrong question.
Similar(58)
At some points we think he will never get his hands on the sandwich, as the other park animals are far too quick and crafty but Badger proves us readers wrong.
Just as writers of the previous types of novels have proved readers wrong on occasions, Cline creates a video game story so good, that it is most aptly enjoyed through prose.
As Taco Bell replied, the inquiring reader was wrong in assuming that the young woman was a model.
Since only whom and a few other words (I/me, he/him etc) show case, English-speakers rarely have occasion to think about the matter.Nonetheless, good writers should master whom: edited prose with who in a place where the objective case (whom) is expected will strike an educated and careful reader as wrong.
The reader was wrong.
Did he get into it, trying to prove that the reader was wrong in his assertions?
I love Frank, but he's always going to rub some readers the wrong way.
That statement might have given your readers the wrong impression of our policy.
Edgar Allan Poe thought that readers were wrong about Bulwer but right about Dickens.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com