Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(56)
Perhaps this reader would be irritated by Tristram Shandy too.
That, dear reader, would be a very big bang for a relatively small buck.
A casual reader would be confused about the relationship between this letter and the book's contents.
ANY reader would be forgiven for being tired of Healthcare.gov stories.
In most futuristic fiction, such lengthy asides to the reader would be both boring and intrusive.
This way the reader would be drawn into a rich and informative experience.
And here, cultured reader, would be the occasion to start building your defense of the undervalued "Goats Head Soup".
Similar(4)
In June, Amazon announced that its Kindle e-reader would be sold in Target stores.
Your friends probably thought the e-reader would be right as rain once you ran a few sanitizing wipes over it.
(Though I suppose that William and Kate knew to expect that a lip-reader would be called in and were on their very best behavior).
The user/reader would be able to make changes, remove parts, play with the DNA or with other pieces of this intricate dene-implies-bene, and behold the results [12]).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com