Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
While the inexperienced reader performed poorly overall and contrast administration did not improve diagnostic performance, a learning curve was also noted.
If either of the pairs of thick or thin film readings yielded discordant results, a third, expert reader performed a tie-breaking read on both types of films.
The two classifications are not strictly independent because one reader performed both assessments.
One musculoskeletal imaging reader performed the grading on two occasions, each six weeks apart.
To assess interrater reliability, a second reader performed the measurements and the results were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (two-way random and absolute agreement).
Further work to assess intra- and inter-observer reliability using the ImageJ method is required before this is widely used – this was not evaluated as part of this study in which only one unblinded reader performed the analysis.
Similar(54)
First, the readers were extensively trained and their reliability was evaluated by having each reader perform twice volume measurements of a 'gold standard' MRI dataset that consisted of 10 randomly selected subjects.
In our study, readers performed better with conventional 2D acquisition than with 3D SPACE acquisition for evaluation of the menisci of the knee with 3.0-T MR imaging.
For the medial meniscus, readers performed better with the 2D technique than with 3D SPACE (accuracies 85 88 % vs. 78 80 %, respectively) (p > 0.05).
Dyslexic and skilled adult control readers performed a primed object-naming task, in which the relationship between the prime and the target was manipulated along perceptual, semantic and phonological dimensions.
Six readers performed an evaluation of the following three methods of background activity assessment in all 20 scans according to the following instructions: 1. Simple ROI: A single 2D-ROI in the contralateral hemisphere including white and gray matter (e.g., 50 mm diameter), as proposed in the German guideline [17].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com