Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
I read this argument with disbelief.
You can read this argument any day in the NRA's house magazine, "America's 1st Freedom", and I doubt you could find a Republican politician who would demur.
Some may read this argument simply as a call to "lay off Saudi Arabia," and react with skepticism.
After all, I suspect there is an alternative universe where you just read this argument and choose to believe that maybe this isn't true.
Similar(56)
It is exhausting to read this line of argument, again and again, every time Canadians are forced to think about Canadian history.
Unitarians and Revisionists will read this last argument against D1 in line with their general orientations.
Years later, I read that this argument has a name: the "doctrine of divine deception".
Most commentators read this section of the argument as implying that reason looks out for what is good for the soul while appetite seeks food, drink, and sex, heedless of their benefit for the soul (437d ff).
It is important to add, however, that most contemporary interpreters do not read the argument of V.3 6 in quite this way.
As we read the arguments it is crucial to keep this method in mind.
I've read the arguments both ways, but I'm prepared to say that this debate isn't even close.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com