Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
Admitted: I read Table Talk: The New Family Dinner in the Sunday Styles section with absolutely no intention of embracing the trend.
The interface is clean and simple - readers can browse by issue, read table of contents and search for keywords across all issues.
In general, we found a NE probability of 0.1 to 0.5% per aligned sequence read (Table 2).
There was little difference in mean age and sex distribution among children sought, administered and read (Table 1).
Although only 50% of registered children were injected and read, we believe that this has not lead to major bias in the interpretation of our results since there was no difference by age and sex among children registered, administered and read (Table 1).
This may, thus, represent false positive RDA identification, represented by a single sequencing read (Table 1).
Similar(44)
Only selected ASVs with more than 200 total reads (Table 1) and stations with more than 100 Mamiellophyceae reads (Table S1) were taken into account.
Sample libraries ranged from 540,082 (JM1) to 341,540 (YM1) sequence reads (Table 4).
Approximately 78%% of them corresponded to unique reads (Table 1) while the mean coverage of these was x36.
Approximately 110 million reads (Table S1, experiment 1) produced 591 million alignments.
Manual and automated libraries generated comparable number of reads (Table S2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com