reaction for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reaction for" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct phrase would be "reaction to" when referring to a response to something. Example: "Her reaction to the news was unexpected."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

I'll have more reaction for you soon.

The Guardian

"It's going to get reaction for sure".

The New York Times

This seems an exaggerated reaction for now.

The Guardian - Opinion

The reaction for him is pity.

The New York Times - Sports

4.18pm GMT That's all the reaction for today..

The Guardian

News: ecstatic reaction for 12 Years a Slave.

The Guardian - Film

"With 'Spring Breakers' I'm looking for a reaction for sure.

The New York Times

The natural reaction for householders is to fear the worst.

The Economist

Reaction, for the most part, was less than sympathetic.

The New York Times

"Just shut up," you want to say, never a good reaction for a theatergoer.

The New York Times

5.00am BST Trophy Presentation Mixed reaction for David Stern, which is better than he usually gets.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "reaction to" when describing a response to something. For example, "Her reaction to the news was surprise."

Common error

Avoid using "reaction for" as it is grammatically incorrect. The correct preposition to use with "reaction" is "to". Using "for" can confuse readers and make your writing seem unprofessional.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reaction for" functions as a prepositional phrase, but it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig indicates that the correct form is typically "reaction to" when describing a response. Its misuse often stems from confusion with other prepositions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

9%

Academia

7%

Reference

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "reaction for" appears in a number of sources, including news and media outlets, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct and preferred usage is "reaction to". As Ludwig AI indicates, using "reaction for" can detract from the clarity and professionalism of your writing. Always opt for ""reaction to"" or a suitable alternative such as ""response to"" or ""reply to"" to ensure grammatical correctness and clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

response to

This is the most direct and grammatically correct alternative, indicating a reply or answer to something.

in response to

Emphasizes the action being a direct result of something that preceded it.

reply to

Similar to 'response to', but often implies a more direct and immediate answer.

answer to

Focuses on providing a solution or clarification in response to a question or problem.

counteraction to

Suggests an action taken to oppose or neutralize something.

feedback on

Implies receiving comments or evaluations about something.

effect of

Highlights the consequence or result of a particular cause or action.

influence of

Emphasizes the power or capacity to affect someone or something.

impact of

Focuses on the significant or powerful effect of something.

result of

States the outcome or consequence directly caused by something else.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "reaction" in a sentence?

The correct preposition to use with "reaction" is "to". For example, "What was his "reaction to" the movie?" is correct, while "What was his reaction for the movie?" is not.

What can I say instead of "reaction for"?

The most appropriate substitute for "reaction for" is "response to". You can also use "reply to", or "answer to" depending on the context.

Is "reaction for" grammatically correct?

No, "reaction for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct usage is ""reaction to"".

What's the difference between "reaction to" and "reaction for"?

"Reaction to" indicates a response or feeling about something. "Reaction for" is not standard English and should be avoided.