Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Experimentally naïve, captive G. soricina required more than 5000 trials before reaching a criterion of 85 percent correct responses to the rewarded shape.
Each rat was trained for 30 min a day until reaching a criterion of >80% average success for 4 consecutive days, with <0.05% SEM; this occurred at least 24 days after the first training session.
Each rat underwent 80 trials a day until reaching a criterion of 75% accuracy.
The numbers reaching a criterion of 60 seconds were also compared by one-tailed Fisher exact test, with Tocher's modification.
Each rat completed 10 of these training trials per session, and was given two sessions a day until reaching a criterion of 80% correct alternations for two consecutive sessions.
Similar(55)
Simple discrimination training typically took 5 sessions to reach a criterion of 80% correct.
Once a mouse reached 70% correct in both contexts we began presenting the mice with five trials of each context per session in a pseudorandom pattern (A-B-A-AB-A-B-B-A-B). Mice were trained until they reached a criterion of at least 80% correct in 3 consecutive sessions.
Phase 2 of training continued until the participant reached a criterion of 0.66 proportion of trials correct on a block of 32 trials, or until about an hour had passed (cutoff = 60 min in Experiment 1, cutoff = 75 min in Experiment 2).
They can explore the surrounding woods, fields, and nearby stream, and by signing out to let others know where they are going, those who have reached a criterion age can venture as far off campus as they choose.
A reward was delivered when the cumulative time that the rat depressed a retractable lever reached a criterion duration (the opportunity cost or "price" of the stimulation).
When mice reached a criterion of 30 lever presses in less than 45 min on two consecutives days they were shifted to a PR3 schedule for two days before PR7 testing began.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com