Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
The raw prevalence rates were estimated from the EWCS 2010 and the predicted from Equation 1.
A raw prevalence estimate was generated by first using inverse probability weighting.
An Italian study of rare diseases estimated the overall raw prevalence at 33.09 per 10,000 inhabitants.
Seven studies were identified as containing raw prevalence data suitable for meta-analysis (additional file 1) [ 8- 14].
Therefore, our raw prevalence values should not be considered representative of either the US population or the Chinese population in the US.
As the total screened population was 714, the raw prevalence of new undiagnosed ASC in this Chinese sample was 130 per 10,000 (95% CI: 58, 286).
Similar(48)
The raw pooled prevalence estimate was 77.9%95%5% CI 75.0-80.875.0-80.8%ases with known HIV status.
For the outcomes 'pain at present' and 'a period of pain' raw baseline prevalence's were calculated.
We only included patients in the raw data prevalences that were acceptable patients and had valid observation time and drug exposure dates needed to be within the patient's observation period.
In raw products, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in freshwater fish (11.4%) than in seawater fish (1.80%) and shrimp (1.69%).
bN = raw unweighted sample size; however, prevalence and prevalence odds ratio estimates are based on weighted data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com