This applied equally to the independent comparisons, and to the raw cross-species plots (not shown).
If the axonal delay is larger than the backpropagation delay, this results in a shift of the raw cross-correlation function to the left.
The significant regressions are plotted in Figure 1a d, together with their associated raw cross-species plots, which show closely similar trends.
We also produced raw cross-species plots, for which the absolute rates along each lineage were calculated using the estimated divergence dates.
For the Euarchontoglires, by contrast, lifespan, fecundity and generation time had slopes close to zero, and no visible trend in the raw cross-species plots.
4.1.1.1, the shift of the raw cross-correlation function by (dA − dBP) has no effect, as Γ ji (Δ t)} is constant.
Lifespan, by contrast, shows no trend, but this is attributable to two clear outliers, appearing as such in both the diagnostic tests of the regressions (Fig. 2c) and in the raw cross-species scatter-plots (Fig. 2d).
Conversely, if the axonal delay is smaller than the backpropagation delay, the raw cross-correlation function is shifted to the right (Fig. 8c, for the extreme case of dA = 0, dBP = d).
In order to calculate the synaptic drift as in (17), we therefore need to integrate the synaptic weight changes over Δ t s, weighted by the raw cross-correlation function at the synapse.
Images of the raw cross sections in Figure 6 show that endoglucanase barely adheres to epidermal cells in any of the two organs while both enzymes adhere most to parenchyma cells.
