Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(5)
The μ and σ for the ratios of model predictions to experimental findings were 0.99 and 0.20, respectively (Case III in Table 3).
All the predictions made by the model were divided by 1.27, which is the average of the ratios of model prediction to test result.
This might be due to statistical variety related to μ (=0.99) and σ (=0.20) for the ratios of model predictions to experimental findings (see Case III in Table 3).
The hazard ratios of model 1 remained.
Rather than explicitly computing the model probability, one usually considers ratios of model probabilities, allowing direct comparison between different models.
Similar(54)
Ratios of Models S1 S3 to the observation are averaged over 15 stations.
The ratios of Models 0, C, and H1 H3 to the observation are averaged over 15 stations.
Fig. 8 Fourier amplitude spectral ratios of Models H2 and H3 to Model C. Ratios are averaged over 10 patterns of heterogeneity of Models H2 and H3.
The mean and standard deviation are plotted as solid and dashed lines, respectively Fig. 9 Fourier amplitude spectral ratios of Models 0, C, and H3 to the observation.
Our decision to analyze only subsets of ≤3 predictors represents a compromise between a strict interpretation of Burnham and Anderson's rule of thumb, and much lower n/k ratios of models including all of our uncorrelated behaviors.
Posterior probability ratios of models including a different a number of background functions, ζ, in the analysis of the time series in Additional file 1, Figure S1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com