Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In principle, we can predict phenotypic H MS ratios of crossing progenies based on different inheritance models.
Similar(59)
Results were expressed as arbitrary units by calculating the ratio of crossing points of amplification curves stat3 mRNAs and internal standard by using the RelQuant software (Roche Diagnostics).
Existing methods require fitting intensity ratios of cross- to diagonal-peaks as a function of the constant-time (CT) in CT-COSY experiments, while other methods utilize measurement of peak separation.
Assuming inputs to be strong complementsin production implies that the ratios of cross elasticities to own-courseelasticities are smaller.
Medians and ratios of cross-reactive hits are shown.
Teff distributions of the ratios of cross-reactive hits are not different between databases.
The effect of glycosylation on dimerization was examined for all isoforms at a variety of Skp1 concentrations and ratios of cross-linker to protein.
Since the distributions of the ratios of cross-reactive hits were not normally distributed, non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon rank sum test) were used to evaluate differences in the distributions of ratios of cross-reactive hits between databases.
Results of the statistical analysis (P-values) of the comparison between the distributions of ratios of cross-reactive hits between databases and types of epitopes are also shown in sub-tables.
Although the median number of cross-reactive hits between these T cell epitopes and the HM (Median=29, SD=68.03) is different from the median number of hits with the HG (Median = 2, SD = 5.96), no significant difference is found when the ratios of cross-reactive hits are compared (p = 0.1; Table 1).
Comparisons between databases by type of epitope (e.g. HG vs. HM for CEFT; see sub-table B) we observe that (1) for CEFT, the distributions of the ratios of cross-reactive hits of the three databases are not different; (2) for Tregs, HG is different from both HM and HP and HM is not different from HP; and (3) for random peptides, HG, HM, and HP are all different.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com