Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Of course, the absence of rationality is true of any speculation.
Similar(11)
Anderson's doctrine of divine incomprehensibility is true but trivial, and not obviously relevant to the rationality of belief in apparent contradictions about God.
If this is true, and emotions are to some extent under our voluntary control, then emotions will also be assessable for their strategic rationality.
Now it could be that while this is true of the tradition that developed out of the Buddha's teachings, the Buddha himself held the unfettered use of rationality in quite high esteem.
Whether or not it is true by definition, i.e., whether real agents can fail to satisfy its demands, the EU characterisation of rationality serves to structure and thus identify an agent's preference attitudes.
True rationality is social rationality.
On models of faith that take a cognitive component as central, and construe faith's object as propositional, reasonable faith arguably needs to conform to evidentialism the requirement, generally thought essential to rationality, to hold propositions to be true only to the extent justified on one's available evidence.
So, here again, rationality is not enough.
Not that rationality is that effective here.
One could argue that rationality isn't everything.
For this reason, rationality is uncodifiable.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com