Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
I have assumed that Davidson's social route towards rationality is correct, but of course this can be questioned.
Similar(59)
Lastly, we might adopt a particularism about our judgments of rational cases of scientific inquiry and hold that sensitive judgments about rationality are correct but not in virtue of conforming to a general principle about what is rational.
And if the rationality account is correct, then rational actors will not comply with the social contract any more than they will cooperate with each other before it is made.
Of course, rationality is no guarantee of correctness.
Moreover, assuming that fitting the data is constitutive of a good scientific theory, the more radical historicist thesis that the correct theory of scientific rationality is conceptually constrained by the history of science also obtains.
So, here again, rationality is not enough.
Not that rationality is that effective here.
One could argue that rationality isn't everything.
True rationality is social rationality.
For this reason, rationality is uncodifiable.
The literature on bounded rationality is large.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com