Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
No, there's no rationality here, no method - just madness.
But nothing less than the term rationality here.
There is part of me that loves the pure rationality here.
Koeppel argues, convincingly, that the show of hardheaded rationality here is merely a show.
And we mustn't confusedly bring in considerations of practical rationality here.
Similar(55)
But there is more than rationality involved here.
A degree of rationality is assumed here in that these risk-reduction models assume that if individuals are given the right information and tools (condoms) they will rationally change their behaviour.
First, the asking of this skeptical question reveals a commitment to at least instrumental rationality, since one is here questioning whether being practically rational would advance one's ends.
So, here again, rationality is not enough.
Not that rationality is that effective here.
Had the courts below undertaken this inquiry, rather than unreflectively applying the minimum rationality test, the outcome here might well have been different.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com