Exact(4)
Eight studies either described dropouts compared with study completers and/or described reasons for dropout [ 18, 20– 28, 28, 30] and only two studies reported a rationale for sample size [ 22, 23].
The methodological quality of the included studies is summarised in Tables 4 and 5. Most qualitative studies provided a rationale for sample selection, but a clear rationale for sample size was less common.
The seven qualitative studies were high quality with regard to data collection, analysis and reporting; however most lacked a clear theoretical framework; did not address interviewer bias; or provide a rationale for sample size.
Most criteria reflecting the internal validity of studies were met by a majority of studies, with the exception of three internal validity criteria: retention, reporting a rationale for sample size and conducting analyses with consideration for missing data that maintained the fidelity of the randomisation.
Similar(56)
Specimens were assessed for sample size.
†Weighted for sample size.
*Standardized for sample size.
See Statistical and analytical plans for the rationale for planned sample size.
See Supplementary Table 3 for sample sizes.
It is particularly important for RCTs, where specific null hypotheses are tested, that a clear description of the methodology and rationale for choosing a sample size is given.
The rationale for setting the sample size at 250 subjects per group is based on "data handling procedure #2: 3-month lag censoring analysis" as follows.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com