Sentence examples for rational knowledge of from inspiring English sources

As metaphysicians they go far in refuting the skepticism regarding rational knowledge of the relationship between the deity and the universe.

Kant saves rational knowledge of nature by limiting rational knowledge to nature.

Maritain also acknowledges the possibility of a natural, pre-philosophical, but still rational knowledge of God (see Approches de Dieu, pp. 13-22).

She argues that conscience is not an immediate source of moral knowledge, as Burnet would have it, but a source of moral affection or feeling that complements, and presupposes, a proper (i.e., rational) knowledge of moral laws.

These incorrect responses provided important information because they were a better test of the working hypothesis, since they were not based on a rational knowledge of mathematics.

Pleasure might simply reflect a rational knowledge of Mathematics, the correlation higher than chance reported above between correct choice and pleasure, and that lower than chance between displeasure and wrong choice, may simply indicate that pleasure/displeasure occurred after the known correct answers had been selected by the subjects.

The truths that Descartes presents to Elisabeth supply a body of rational knowledge on the basis of which we are able to use our free will correctly, choosing good over evil.

You have to let go of all that rational knowledge to think the next card is going to put you in gravy.

According to Kant's argument, we can have rational knowledge only of the domain of possible experience, not of supersensible objects such as God and the soul.

While God is not the first but the last concept in the order of rational knowledge, after the knowledge of creatures, He is the first object of natural knowledge, which is had in the first intentions and in which our intellect always proceeds from what is most indeterminate.

While he points to them when he discusses the challenges of Academic skepticism, he does not systematically build upon them in refuting skepticism about sense perception, rational knowledge, and knowledge of testimony.