The security hypothesis is underpinned by the crime opportunities theoretical framework of rational choice and routine activities.
Crime opportunity theories, that is, rational choice and routine activities linked to situational crime prevention, have been applied via the 'security hypothesis'.
The data have implications for a more rational design and routine use of qPCR assays.
The nature of the sport, and the direction of force application, dictates that these pulling movements and closed chain exercises are indeed rational and explains their routine recommendation.
As well as rational reasoning, emotional processes and routine behaviour (lacking any decision) also affect motivation when deciding on a specific behaviour [ 14].
Checklists may encourage rational, systematic, routine and transparent due diligence whilst recognising the importance of, and encouraging careful attention to, a wide variety of constraints and expectations.
Beyond crime and safety, a number of other individual and neighborhood factors are thought to impact the adoption of HSP, based upon theories such as rational choice, routine activity and situational crime prevention (see e.g. Clarke, 1995).
Drawing on opportunity theories such as rational choice perspective (Clarke and Cornish 1985) and routine activity theory (Cohen and Felson 1979), situational analyses involve a shift in analytic focus.
The theories, rational choice, routine activities, CPTED, and defensible space techniques, comprise an important basis for explaining some of the root causes of certain crimes that may occur repeatedly in specific locations.
