Sentence examples for ratio priority from inspiring English sources

Examples of other contents for the statements coded as rules were age limit for cholesterol treatment, importance of looking for secondary hypercholesterolaemia, the role of LDL/HDL ratio, priority of smoking vs. pharmacological treatment, the desired blood pressure value for diabetics blood pressure and the cut-off value for ten-year risk for primary prevention.

They allow users to share available resources by exploiting the effective signal-to-interference plus noise ratio and priority level, depending on throughput, delay, and packet error rate.

As before, a 1 1 ratio of high priority to standard priority was assumed along with assigning M=40 and N=20.

Figure 12 Contour plot showing relationship between number of chemists, biologists and predicted output for a 1 1 ratio of high priority and standard priority lead optimization campaigns.

Figure 11 Relationship between FTE efficiency parameters M, N and predicted average number of preclinical candidates per year for a working group of 36 scientists (18 chemists and 18 biologists) and 1 1 ratio of high priority to standard priority lead optimization projects.

y = t − Aup 1 + Bup · e x Cup − Dup − Adn 1 + Bdn · e − x Cdn + Ddn ) (6) Figure 9 Contour plot showing relationship between number of chemists, biologists and predicted output for a 1 1 ratio of high priority and standard priority lead optimization campaigns.

In this regard, very little differences were noted at the higher FTE efficiency range (i.e., larger values of M and N). Figure 13 Productivity difference map between two FTE efficiency simulations that systematically varied M and N for 18 chemists and 18 biologists (1 1 ratio of high priority to standard priority lead optimization projects).

Figure 17 Relationship between FTE efficiency parameters M, N and predicted average number of preclinical candidates per year (1 1 ratio of high priority to standard priority lead optimization projects with hit to lead and lead optimization project lifetime cutoff values of 3.5 and 4.5 years, respectively. (A) Working group of 60 scientists (30 chemists and 30 biologists).

Assuming a 1 1 ratio of high priority to standard priority lead optimization projects, a fixed FTE efficiency of 80% and the simulation parameters listed in Table 1, the output for 36 scientists (18 chemists and 18 biologists) as a function of percent follow-on projects versus percent chemistry/biology driven projects was predicted (Figure 16).

In general, a program having a high benefit cost ratio will take priority over others with lower ratios.

The model explained 24% of the variation in the priority ratio of two stands as evaluated by an individual judge.