Sentence examples for ratio of discrimination from inspiring English sources

Methodologically, these researchers suggest a ratio of discrimination and inconsistency to distinguish experts.

The coefficient is non-parametric, making no assumptions of the data, and is conceptually simple, being the ratio of observed discriminations to the maximum possible number of discriminations.

Delta is the ratio of observed discriminations made to the maximum possible number; it ranges from 0 (no discriminations at all are made) to 1 (all possible discriminations are made for a given sample size and scale range).

Delta may be interpreted as the ratio of observed discriminations to the maximum possible number; Delta = 0.80 indicates that 80% of all possible discriminations for the sample were actually made.

This could be compared with the number of differences actually observed and expressed as a ratio: the coefficient of discrimination.

Body composition was measured by DXA, which yields accurate and precise estimates of adiposity [ 39, 40], and estimation of the A G ratio enabled discrimination of associations of total adiposity and body fat distribution with %DBV and ADBV.

The filter performance was tested in terms of discrimination ratio, peak-to-correlation plane energy ratio, peak-to-sidelobe ratio and average similarity measure with digitally degraded fingerprints.

The potential of cytokine ratios for discrimination between RR and its absence was also evident from the ROC (receiver operating characteristics) with AUC (areas under curve) ranging from 0,955 1.

The δ13C ratio is the result of discrimination against the heavier 13CO2 during diffusion through the stomata and consequent carboxylation in favour of the lighter 12CO2 (Farquhar et al. 1989; Brienen et al. 2011).

Results presented in Table 1 refer to the "qualititative" indicator of perceived discrimination, but identical results were obtained when alternatively using the "quantitative" indicator (estimated odds ratio per additional experience of discrimination: 1.31 among the IDU group, 1.37 among the heterosexual group).

The performance in these studies was evaluated based on the correct discrimination ratio of frames [7 9] and not on the correct discrimination ratio of music boundaries.