Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(26)
The ratio of difference (fold change) were determined between the unbound phages and bound phages.
The ratio of difference between unbound and bound αUbi phage was determined (Fig. 6a).
The highest ratio of difference was presented by M13KO7 blocked in PTM buffer, followed by a combination of PTM buffer and lysate and lysate only.
The highest ratio of difference between unbound and eluted αUbi phage was recorded from sample 2 (PTM buffer only) with a 1,000-fold 1,000-fold followedifference-followedference recorded from sample 4 (PTM byffer and lysate).
SNR was calculated for 20 cells for each time point as a ratio of difference in the mean signal in the cells and outside divided by the standard deviation of the signal outside the cells (see Fig. 3B).
On the other hand, the highest ratio of difference between unbound and bound M13KO7 was determined from sample 1 (PBS only) at 716,000-fold, followed by the PTM buffer and lysate combination (254,000-fold).
Similar(34)
Calculation of the ratio of differences in synonymous vs. non-synonymous nucleotide substitutions provides evidence for strong purifying selection (K S / K a >> 1).
The component costs are totalled and presented in Table 3 as the 'IHSD Template values', along with the differences in rates of Indigenous utilization of health services, adherence to treatments, and the ratio of differences in future cost-offsets.
The similar ratios of difference were determined for blocked M13KO7 sample sets at a cut off of 1-fold.
The ratios of difference between unbound and eluted fractions for αUbi phage across 4 samples were 57-fold, 325-fold, 169-fold and 172-fold (Fig. 4a).
As for the ratios of difference between unbound and bound M13KO7, the highest fold change was 210,000-fold recorded from sample 3 (lysate only) while the lowest fold change was determined from sample 4 (PTM buffer and lysate) with only 11,000-fold difference (Fig. 4b).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com