A second point related to the subtractive clustering algorithm is that it requires to optimize the ratio of cluster dimensions for the best performance.
In 311 of the 724 BAC clones, where the average signal ratio of Cluster BN was higher than that of Cluster AN, the average signal ratio of Cluster BT was also higher than that of Cluster AT without exception.
In 413 of the 724 BAC clones, where the average signal ratio of Cluster BN was lower than that of Cluster AN, the average signal ratio of Cluster BT was also lower than that of Cluster AT without exception.
The Stability of a cluster is the ratio of cluster sizes between r = 3.1 and r = 1.1.
The ratio of cluster numbers for the urban and rural area is based on the ratio of the population (42%: 58%).
The axonal home column ratio of cluster 1 interneurons was lower (0.88 ± 0.12) than that of cluster 2 or 3 interneurons (see Supplementary Figs 2 and 3).
To assess the internal organization within a CRU, the ratio of cluster filled with RyR to the total CRU area was calculated.
To determine whether our representation of the candidates in the principal components space reflects the structural clusters found by LocARNA for the different k levels, we calculate the proportion of correct assignments, which measures the ratio of cluster members that are closer to their assigned cluster centroid as opposed to a centroid of another cluster.
We interpret x as U signal intensities, y as U signal intensities, K as the number of isotope ratios, β k as the isotope ratio of cluster k, σ as the reproducibility of the measurement and π k as the percentage of data points belonging to cluster k.
Unfortunately, it is not possible to estimate confidence intervals for the rate ratios of clusters detected by scan statistics, because of the multiple testing part of the many circles evaluated.
On B-cell follicular lymphoma data test, although the CC and MF annotation ratios of gene clusters found by each of three methods are asymptotically equal (see Figure 4B), the BP annotation ratio of WDCM clusters (84.9%) is much higher than those of K-means clusters (71.6%) and SOM clusters (74.8%).
