Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Expert and novice film ratings were evaluated using a single-item measure (rating scale 1 10) with success using students, online ratings, and expert film critics (Plucker et al. 2009).
Dalhousie and Borg ratings were evaluated using canonical plots that compare actual ratings of one scale to the average ratings of the other scale at the same workload.
Similar(57)
Ratings are evaluated using a six-point Likert scale: describes me very well (1) – does not describe me at all (6).
The ratings of symptom severity were evaluated using the 17-item version of the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D17) [ 34].
All correlations were evaluated using Spearman rho.
Current risk of self harm, violence, self-neglect with serious lack of caution or vulnerability from exploitation from others was evaluated using staff ratings on the Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG) [ 26] for the North Islington and North Southwark studies.
Locomotor recovery was evaluated using BBB score.
Depression was evaluated using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale CES-D Scale CES-D
Binding was evaluated using flow cytometry.
Lipid peroxidation was evaluated using PAR immunohistochemistry.
Statistical significance was evaluated using ANOVA.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com