Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Based on Eq. (38), the material ratings of Table 4 are normalized into dimensionless values of Table 5.
Similar(59)
Comparison of the global rating by AAH subjects to the interviewer rating scale demonstrated a striking trend of increasing scale scores with lower ratings moving from an average of about 3 points for subjects who rated their neighborhood as "excellent" to about 7 points for ratings of "poor" (Table 2).
We found no evidence that the man's ability to borrow was associated with ratings of sociability (Table 4, column [1], [2], row [3]).
This aspect represents the resolution phase of the practical inquiry model in the Cognitive Presence, confirmed by quantitative ratings of the seminars (Table 4).
Although there was no group × time interaction, the repeated measures analyses for the relatives' ratings of the relationship (Table 3) indicated that there was a significant effect of time [ F 2, 39) = 19.4, p < 0.001], with relationship scores improving significantly at the final follow-up assessment compared with the baseline and intermediate assessment.
Two studies using a national database [ 10, 19] received a study methodology quality rating of L1, 1 study [ 31] received a rating of L2, 3 studies [ 2, 20, 24] received a rating of L5, and the remainder of studies received ratings of L3 or L4 (Table 3) [ 4- 6, 18, 21- 25, 25- 30, 32- 36].
Accordingly the detailed ratings of these contributory factors (Table 2) may be multiplied by 0.5 and 1.5 respectively.
None of the study variables were associated with ratings of anticipated DL discomfort (Table 3).
Table 1 shows the coding and ratings of the 10 domains [see table 1], and the appendix shows the chapters assessed [see additional file 1].
ABC, for instance, soared to the top of the network ratings league table in 1999-2000, on the back of the early success of "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?".
To aid interpretation of Table 6, staff ratings mean that for every one unit increase in GAF, the odds of being in a higher CDIS Involvement category decreases by 2%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com