Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Fox won the night in all the important ratings measures.
In the preliminary Nielsen estimates for Sunday, ABC was No. 1 in key ratings measures, as it usually is.
"American Idol," the Fox talent show, drew an estimated 23.8 million viewers and anchored the network's victory in Nielsen's major ratings measures.
Both broadcasters can also reasonably point to technological and cultural shifts, which are not captured by the conventional ratings measures, as reasons why the figures are more difficult to parse than they once might have been.
On the strength of Tuesday's "Idol," which drew an estimated 24.6 million viewers, 17 million stayed tuned to watch a repeat of "House," and Fox was No. 1 for the night in all key ratings measures.
The results in Nielsen's estimates were the same as on recent Wednesdays: ABC easily won the night in all key ratings measures, as the two-hour series premiere of "Brat Camp" brought in 10.28 million viewers and won every half-hour among the 18-to-49 18-to-49 18-to-49
Similar(50)
However, based on the findings of univariate studies, we cannot conclude that CBCL, Conners Rating Scale, and DSM ratings measure the same construct, or that they are influenced by the same set of genes.
This led the researchers to conclude (in How People Evaluate Others in Organizations, edited by Manuel London): "Although it is implicitly assumed that the ratings measure the performance of the ratee, most of what is being measured by the ratings is the unique rating tendencies of the rater.
Dyspnoea ratings measured by modified Borg, 0 10 numerical rating scale (NRS), 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), or 300 mm VAS were converted into standardised mean differences (SMDs).
Transition ratings measure different aspects of change than indirect measurement of change do.
The real question is whether ratings measure instructors' ability to facilitate learning, not whether all students rate an instructor similarly.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com