Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
Based on the results of Round 1, a summary report was provided to the experts at the meeting with the following key feedback information for each feature: 1) respondents' own ratings, 2) median agreement rating, 3) summary of qualitative comments, and 4) whether a consensus was achieved at Round 1.
Four factors based on an eigenvalue cutoff of = 1.0 confirmed these groupings: namely, A) impulsive aggressive behavior based on 1) parent ratings, 2) teacher ratings, and B) cognitive impulsivity rated by 3) parents, and 4) teachers (tables 2 and 3).
As for the source of homework ratings, 11 used therapist ratings, 2 used client ratings, 8 used an objective rating, and 2 used both client and therapist ratings.
We analyzed 3 types of agreement: (1) within specialties using independent ratings, (2) between specialties using joint ratings, and (3) between clinicians (orthopaedists and CAPs) with more versus less experience.
For intermediate ratings (2, 3 and 4), the respective performances were 83.28, 89.63 and 89.67% correct.
As in our previous work [3], six conditions were used for GD1: (1) ratings; (2) flow in and volume < 250 ml; (3) flow in and 250 ml < volume <500 ml; (4) null flow and volume = 500 ml; (5) flow out and 250 ml< volume <500 ml; and (6) flow out and volume <250 ml.
Similar(47)
So far, studies have shown the increasing popularity of such websites when it comes to the number of ratings [ 2, 7, 8], the traffic rank [ 8, 9], and the awareness of the population [ 10], and others have addressed the content and nature of narrative comments [ 3, 11, 12] or analyzed the applied patient satisfaction surveys [ 6].
The question about the intensity of symptoms was dichotomized into the symptom not at all being present (rating 1) versus the symptom being present (ratings 2 5).
craig s (ManusBret) (@Cstodd89) @HunterFelt pic.twitter.com/dw7Gw9Xtro January 7 , 20141.28am GMT National Anthem ratings 5/10.
At 10, CBS's "Shark" delivered more modest ratings (10.5 million).
Of the 46 restaurants we reviewed, 21 (or 46percentt) received one of the top ratings: 3 excellent, 18 very good.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com